Filed under: Coupe, Toyota
The Toyota FT-86 II concept brings us one step closer to a production rear-wheel-drive Toyota that promises to be fun to drive and great looking at the same time. We don’t have a whole lot in the way of hard specs, but we do have plenty of high resolution pictures of a really hot-looking concept.
Toyota trotted out its black beauty in front of the all-seeing camera lens for an in-depth studio shoot, and we’ve got the pictures to prove it. Check out full compliment of high-resolution photos in the gallery below, then hit the jump to check out the video of the Sports Illustrated Swim Suit-style photo shoot. If the production FT-86 looks this good, we can’t wait for hit to hit news stands dealers everywhere.
Gallery: Toyota FT-86 Concept Studio Shots
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
[Source: Toyota]
Continue reading Toyota FT-86 II Concept goes in for some glamor shots [w/video]
Toyota FT-86 II Concept goes in for some glamor shots [w/video] originally appeared on Autoblog on Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:24:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Continue reading “Toyota FT-86 II Concept goes in for some glamor shots [w/video]”

Plaintiffs in the unintended acceleration class action case against Toyota are striking back against the findings laid out by NASA. It was the National Aeronautics and Space Administration that produced research showing electronics were not to blame for any sudden acceleration-related issues.
The California court system has found that Toyota Motor Insurance Services does not violate the state’s consumer warranty law. According to Automotive News, a court of appeal found that the contracts offer enough services outside of the factory warranty to be considered legal. Toyota was originally sued after Weber DeSiqueira purchased a then-new 2007 Tundra. At the time, the vehicle came with a three-year, 36,000 mile warranty, but DeSiqueira also laid down $1,145 for a Toyota Extra Care Vehicle Service Agreement. The lawsuit alleged that the service agreement covered the same items as the factory, putting the Japanese automaker in violation of the California warranty law.
